Bimekizumab on structural damage in r-axial SpA & remote monitoring vs face-to-face
In our late-breaking abstract coverage, we spoke with Prof. Denis Poddubnyy from Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin to discuss key data from EULAR 2024 on axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). We first explored the open-label extension results of the phase 3 BE MOBILE 2 study (NCT04436640), which assessed bimekizumab's impact on 2-year radiographic progression in the spine of patients with radiographic axSpA. Hypothesized to offer superior inhibition of bone formation due to its dual action on IL-17A and IL-17B, bimekizumab's findings were compared with other treatments like ixekizumab, upadacitinib, secukinumab, and certolizumab pegol, highlighting implications for clinical practice.
Additionally, we examined a recent study by Berg et al., which compared remote monitoring and patient-triggered monitoring to traditional face-to-face consultations. The discussion focuses on how these findings could influence daily practice, patient outcomes, and healthcare resource management.